REVISION PROCESS
Articles that receive a "Minor Revision" or "Major Revision" decision must be corrected and resubmitted in accordance with the feedback provided by reviewers and editors. The author(s) will receive a decision letter from the Editor-in-Chief outlining the necessary changes and stating the deadline for resubmission.

Authors are required to submit the following documents during the correction process:
Article Under Revision - A version of the revised article containing the final text, with no markings or highlights applied.
Response Document to Referees - A detailed document responding to each of the referee and editor comments point by point. The authors in this document are:
. They should clearly state how they responded to each comment.
. The revised article should refer to the line numbers where the relevant changes appear.
. If there are suggestions that have not been implemented, they must be explained with their reasons.

Marked Article (Revised Copy) - A version in which differences between the original and revised versions are shown in a traceable manner (e.g., in track changes mode or highlighted) to facilitate comparison. The corrections must be submitted within the specified time. Authors who cannot send by the deadline must request an extension in advance.
Failure to make any notification within the specified period may result in the automatic rejection of the article.
The resubmitted article may be subjected to a second peer review, especially in cases of major revisions. The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief, considering the referees' recommendations and the quality of the authors' responses.

WRITING CRITERIA
The authors of applications reporting research findings must meet all four criteria set forth by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE):
1. Making significant contributions to the concept or design of the study, or to the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data;
2.  Making significant contributions to the concept or design of the study, or to the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data;
3.  Approval of the final version to be published;
4. Accept responsibility for all aspects of the work, ensuring that any questions regarding the accuracy or integrity of any section are properly investigated and resolved.

Authors must determine who is eligible to write and in what order the authors will be listed before submitting their articles. Fiscalis editors do not resolve authorship disputes. After the first submission, any changes to the number of authors or their order must be explained in writing to the Editor-in-Chief. Editors reserve the right to forward any writing misconduct to the research officer at the author's institution or employer or to the appropriate academic ethics authorities.
Authors can use CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) to provide information about individual contributions during the application.

POST-PUBLICATION CORRECTION REQUESTS AND ARTICLE RETRACTION POLICY
All correction requests after publication are subject to editorial review. The Editorial Board evaluates the necessity and appropriateness of corrections based on the nature of the error, its impact on the article, and supporting evidence. If approved, the correction will be made in the journal archive. The magazine follows COPE guidelines.

Article Retraction (Pre-publication)
The article retraction process applies only to articles in the printing phase that may contain errors, accidental duplicate submissions, or ethical violations (e.g., multiple submissions, fabricated data, or plagiarism). The HTML and PDF contents of the retracted articles will be removed and replaced with a statement indicating retraction and a link to the journal’s retraction policy.

Article Retraction (Post-Publication)
Retractions are issued for serious ethical violations such as plagiarism, data fabrication, ghostwriting, or publication without co-author approval. Withdrawal notices include the following elements:
.  A formal retraction note titled “Retraction: [Article Title]” is published in a subsequent issue.
. A watermark reading “Retracted” on the PDF of the original article.
. Removal of the HTML version that ensures transparency in corrections while maintaining academic integrity.

Article Removal (Legal and Security Concerns)
In rare cases, an article may need to be permanently removed from the journal’s online database due to legal issues, court decisions, defamation, or significant health risks. While the metadata (title and authors) will be preserved, the article content will be replaced with a legal notice explaining its removal.

Self-Archiving Policy
Authors are allowed to archive their published works themselves in open-access repositories as well as on corporate or personal websites. When sharing their articles, authors should cite the original publication appropriately and include the DOI number. Furthermore, authors are encouraged to provide a link to the publisher's official website to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record. The version published on the publisher’s website is considered the definitive version of the recordings.

LEGAL WARNING
The views and ideas expressed in the published articles belong solely to the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions of the editor(s), the editorial board, or the publisher. The editors, editorial board, and publisher are not responsible for the content of published articles and do not endorse the views expressed in these articles.
Authors bear full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of their work. The magazine serves as a platform for disseminating research to the scientific community, but does not guarantee the validity of the content.